Talk:Submission review
Transparency in Review Process
I am glad that the review process is transparent and clear. This is very amazing to me. This is the kind of thing I wanted to see happen in the future through WikiJournal.Thinkmaths (talk) 06:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- The transparency was the same last year: wm2014:Submission review. I appreaciate the openness and traceability as well. --Gereon K. (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Review process stopped?
Has the review process stopped? I have not seen any updates since last week. If there's anyway I can be of some help?Thinkmaths (talk) 09:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- No - the process takes several weeks and many Programme Committee members do updates on their reviews in spurts depending on their availability as volunteers during the review period. --Varnent (talk) 05:08, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Also - it appears there has been activity - keep in mind the edits are done on subpages to this page and not the main page itself. --Varnent (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- When I was on the program committee, I kept track of reviews in a spreadsheet and then copied them at once to the wiki. Others might do this way also. Aude (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Varnent: Are those pages accessible? Thinkmaths (talk) 04:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- When I was on the program committee, I kept track of reviews in a spreadsheet and then copied them at once to the wiki. Others might do this way also. Aude (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Missing submission?
Hi, I noticed that this submission is not listed on the review page, presumably because the same submission number has been allocated twice. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 05:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you - I have gone ahead and fixed that. Sorry! --Varnent (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Submission 3013
Hi, I would like to widraw my submission. I did not get a scholarship and cannot attend Wikimania. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Submission 6026
Hi, In submission review 6026, final score isn't correct. It must be 9.400.--SusikMkr (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Submission review and notifications
Hi, I submitted two talks (#1 and #2) and they were only reviewed by a handful of members of the programme committee. It seems like this happened to all submissions. Can you tell me the reason for this? Also, reading the Programme, I understand that my submissions were rejected. That's totally fine, but I would like to know if you already sent out a notification about this that I missed? Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Both submissions were under review until today (actually in the standby list). The submissions have received a high score but not high enough, and we were waiting to see if some submissions which have recieived a higher score will be withdrawn (due to not getting a scholarship or likewise reasons). Deror avi (talk) 16:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- just to note that there are about 20 submissions still pending confirmation and are still not in the public schedule (and are still marked "under review"). Deror avi (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, that's interesting, Deror avi, thanks! Can you also tell me more about why the submissions were only reviewed by a few members of the programme committee? Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- just to note that there are about 20 submissions still pending confirmation and are still not in the public schedule (and are still marked "under review"). Deror avi (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2015 (UTC)